Rigging | Safety and Training | By Troy Raines | Feb 03, 2016
“Why or when would a rigging equipment manufacturer choose to use the forging method versus the casting method?”
Please be patient with me, as I use the word “mold” as a general reference to all tooling used in both the casting and forging processes.
The forging method is appropriate when a manufacturer is:
The casting method is appropriate when a manufacturer is:
Forged parts are always better for rigging equipment because of their part size (same strength from a smaller part), weight, strength, toughness and ductility properties. Cast parts are larger, heavier, weaker, more brittle and require more expensive inspection techniques due to the probability of internal defects. Unfortunately, many rigging manufacturers have resorted to cast rigging hardware because they have hammer size limitations. For years, even Columbus McKinnon has limited the size of its rigging hardware because of its desire to only have its name on forged rigging products.
Expanding its line of high-quality, forged rigging hooks, Columbus McKinnon now offers high-capacity rigging hooks with capacities ranging from 31.5 - 60 tons. Our high-capacity hooks are well suited for heavy-duty lifting applications with features such as a 5:1 design factor; ultra-strong, forged latch tab, quenched and tempered material for maximum strength; and highly visible load rating marking for easy identification.
Troy Raines is a Global Chain and Rigging, Product Engineering Manager at Columbus McKinnon Corporation. He has 15 years of experience with CM on multiple ASME, WSTDA, ASTM, and ISO industry standards and technical committees. Troy believes that we are stronger/smarter as a team and enjoys strategic thinking that finds the best solution for all parties.
Columbus McKinnon's website and/or mobile terms, privacy and security policies don't apply to the site or app you're about to visit. Please review its terms, privacy and security policies to see how they apply to you.